Saturday, 5 January 2013

Richard Warman’s ‘Maximum Disruption’ Attacks upon Freedom of Speech in Canada



The actions of the entity known as Richard Warman are definitely ones that Canadians should be more aware of. Given his propensity for decades of ongoing attacks against freedom of expression here in Canada I feel it behooves all Canadians to take a closer look at his conduct. In doing so people ought to ask themselves how in God’s name our legal system could permit someone like this to go on year after year running amok and getting away with his endless attempts at exploiting Canadian laws for the benefit of his own selfish gain, not to mention the tacit support given to those foreign Jewish lobby groups such as B’nai Brith Canada and the Canadian Jewish Congress; Zionist organizations hell-bent on silencing any and all legitimate criticism of their and Israel’s historic wrongs against humanity.

Warman of course is one of the two B’nai Brith Canada operatives who has been on my ass since 2007, doing his damnedest to shut down www.radicalpress.com and drive me into the hole financially. He’s not alone though for no man is an island unto himself when it comes to the “Jewish hate speech” racket that the Zionist and their lobbyist organizations have created and exploited throughout all the nations of the West since WWII in their ongoing efforts to cover up Zion’s endless crimes.

Back in 2007 when I was first charged with a sec. 13(1) “hate crime” complaint by Harry Abrams and the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada Warman wasn’t named on any of the documents. Had it not been for the fact that I was able to obtain a leaked email I would not have been aware of his surreptitious involvement in my case.

When word got out that I had received this Bolshevik/Zionist “show trial” accusative “complaint” document in my mailbox on November 20, 2007 my local newspaper, the Quesnel Cariboo Observer was interested in doing an interview with me on the subject. Having been a regular contributor to its Letters to the Editor section in the local community paper for over 35 years, plus a bi-weekly columnist, the locals in the community were obviously curious about this sudden complaint from the world’s largest Jewish lobby group.
On January 13, 2008 the Observer ran an article entitled, “TOPHAM VIEWS UNDER ATTACK: B’nai Brith claims anti-Jewish writings“. In the article was expressed my viewpoint and why I felt that B’nai Brith Canada was acting the way it was.

As soon as that story hit the streets Harry Abrams of the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada was on the telephone from Victoria, B.C. doing his utmost to browbeat and intimidate the journalist who had interviewed me for the article. It’s not the first time that ol’ Harry was found to be extremely abusive when dealing with those who he felt were not behaving as good goyim ought to behave when it comes to the questionable machinations of the Jewish state of Israel. Of course the journalist was not impressed one iota with Abrams’ manner of communication.

Soon afterwards Abrams wrote a response to the Letters section of the Observer wherein he did his best to bring up the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion and use that document as some sort of proof that I was posting hate literature against those of the Jewish faith. At the same time he basically demanded that I should remove all posts that he felt were unacceptable and if I did so then that would be the end of the matter. Of course his wishes never came true and beside, given the way that his co-conspirator Richard Warman operates, it’s highly doubtful that had I kowtowed to Abrams’ request that the matter would have ended. As we know from Warman’s relentless attacks upon Marc Lemire, AFTER MARC WILLINGLY REMOVED WHATEVER OFFENDING POSTS WERE ON A WEBSITE RAN BY HIM, complying with their Orwellian demands only makes these censorship control freaks that much more inclined to sink their fangs deeper into their perceived victims.

Following Abrams’ letter to the Editor which was published on January 27, 2008 the newspaper was flooded with letters of support for me that came from around the world. This was just too much for the cheeky Cheka twins, Abrams & Warman, and soon thereafter the owner and publisher of the Quesnel Cariboo Observer, David Black of Black Press (not associated with Conrad Black) received a letter from these two Zionist agents threatening his company with a law suit should it continue to publish any more articles related to the sec. 13 complaint that Abrams had laid against me via the Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC). Warman’s and Abrams’ argument was that the sec. 13(1) complaint was before the CHRC and no decision had yet been made so it was illegal for the Quesnel Cariboo Observer to be publishing anything pertaining to the matter. Of course, like all things that the Zionists say and do, it was pure bullshit.

There are NO legal restrictions in reporting on matters related to the machinations of the Zionist-controlled Canadian Human Rights Commission nor its accessory in crime, the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal. Both these Zionist infested orgs are considered to be quasi-judicial in nature and not subject to the same restrictions as the official Canadian Judicial System (even though it too is just as infested as the others with pro-Zionist sycophants).

And so the upshot of all of this was that Black Press decided it wouldn’t stand up for freedom of speech or to the Jewish lobby and ended up bending to the pressure of these two snivelling censorship snakes and from then on until June of this year a veil of silence hung over my six year long battle with these haters of free expression. That is why you will not be able to find the articles noted above except on my website where I was able to post them prior to their censorship by Black Press.

I’m writing this background information as an aid in understanding just how insane the court system has become since it’s been co-oped by the Jewish lobbyists and their pro-Zionist lawyers and judges who inevitably put the desires of Israel and the racist ideology of Zionism first and foremost when it comes to upholding the supposed rights and freedoms of all Canadians to expressing their views on the Internet.
When I was arrested back in May of 2012 Det-Cst Terry Wilson of the BC HATE CRIME TEAM made a big deal out of trying to convince me that their unit was going to be investigating these charges in a wholly new and unbiased manner and were not planning on bringing into the equation all of the past dealings that I had with these two bozos who had just laid the second sec. 319(2) charge against me; one that resulted in being jailed, losing my firearms and my computers and all of my electronic files and email going back many years.

But of course this was just another stinking pile of crap from another pro-Zionist special agent working for B’nai Brith along with Abrams and Warman. As it turned out later on I found that Det – Cst Wilson had been working with these zio-rats for many years before and all of this sudden new charge and arrest, etc. was nothing less than a further extension of their earlier attempts to shut me down and put me in jail in order to keep the truth about the Zionists hidden from the general public.

So please bear this in mind as you read through the list of vicious attacks perpetrated upon innocent people who have had their rights and freedoms suppressed, spent time in jail, and had their computers and files and firearms seized and their bank accounts drained all because of this one entity who should have been disbarred years ago and prevented from engaging in any legal activities.

Richard Warman is the epitome of all that is wrong with our Canadian legal system and anyone who has ever been harassed, threatened or victimized by this serial psychopathic complainer should be absolved of all accusations and convictions, their names cleared by the federal court and financially compensated for any and all legal costs incurred during their lengthy battles to retain their fundamental rights as given by Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms. As an associate suggested after reading my initial comments here, “An application should be made, if it has not been done already, to have Warman declared a ‘Vexatious Litigant’ – there is ample precedent I think for this where an individual has persistently abused the system, an offence of which Warman is guilty, in spades!  The fact that he has been clearly motivated by malice and personal financial gain and assists a subversive political lobby, would reinforce the application.”
Nothing less in terms of redress ought to be considered when it comes to Richard Warman. Apart from disbarment, a healthy jail sentence of say five years ought to give this traitorous Zionist lackey enough time to reflect on his actions and prepare for a new career upon his release.

With the end of 2012 only hours away I’d like to take one final parting shot at this whole sordid affair known as Zionism. After years and years of researching its fundamentals and observing its ideology in action I’ve come to the only conclusion that I feel any honest, decent human being could be expected to reach. Zionism is, in truth, a mental disease. It’s a psychotic, delusional state of mind wherein adherents to its core cognitive structure and values – all contingent upon a mental belief that one small segment of the human family or species is somehow above and separate from all the rest of humanity – tend to behave in a cult-like fashion in order to outwardly express this political (psycho-mental philosophy) doctrine; one that sees no wrong in the destruction and murder and terrorization of any and all other human beings who stand in the way of its ultimate fulfillment. I can also state with added assurance that the new year will see more and more reasonable, intelligent and caring, loving individuals come to a similar conclusion as the weight of evidence backing such a contention grows heavier and heavier and the Zionist Beast grows more and more desperate and deranged in its behaviour.

God grant that we will stop it before the destruction gets beyond our control.

The best to all of you in 2013!
Love & Peace & Justice for All,
Arthur Topham
Publisher & Editor
The Radical Press
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998″
________________________________
From:  Marc Lemire <marc@lemire.com>
Subject:  Richard Warman’s ‘Maximum Disruption’ Approach:  Defamation Suits, Criminal Complaints, Section 13 cases and even Copyright Act lawsuits
Date:  31 December, 2012 1:01:18 AM PST


Richard Warman’s ‘Maximum Disruption’ Approach:
Defamation Suits, Criminal Complaints, Section 13 cases and even Copyright Act lawsuits
http://blog.freedomsite.org/2012/12/richard-warmans-maximum-disruption.html
http://canadianhumanrightscommission.blogspot.ca/2012/12/richard-warmans-maximum-disruption.html

Richard Warman is one of Canada’s leading serial complainants.  Richard Warman described his tactic of filing complaints as “Maximum Disruption” in a speech he gave to a group called Anti-Racist Action.  According to Mr. Warman; “This approach involved working with the police, the Canadian Human Rights Commission and other organizations to create “maximum disruption” within what he perceives to be the Neo-Nazi movement in Canada.”

Here is a list of some of the lawsuits and other complaints he has filed:

—————————————————–
People Richard Warman has sued or threatened to sue

Alphabetically sorted
Person
Court file # or Source
1)   
3535991 Canada Inc.
Ontario Court File No. 12-55389
2)   
Andrea Rondeau
Ontario Court File No. 10-47357
3)   
Andrew Spencer (Droid1963)
Ontario Court File No. 07-CV-039927SR
4)   
Arnie Lemaire
Ontario Court File No. 09-46638
5)   
Banyen Books
Ontario Court File No. 02-CV-237691SR
6)   
BC Libraries Association
Macleans Magazine: April 21, 2008
7)   
Biosfaire
Ontario Court File No. 02-CV-237691SR
8)   
Black Press Group Ltd.
9)   
Boule De Neige
Ontario Court File No. 02-CV-237691SR
10)           
Bridge of LovePublications
Ontario Ontario Court File No. 02-CV-237691SR
11)           
Byron Tau
12)           
Canadian Association for Free Expression
Ontario Court File No: 04-CV-26550SR
13)           
Canoe Inc.
Ontario Court File No. 12-53851
14)           
Canwest Digital Media
Ontario Court File No. 10-47357
15)           
Canwest Global Communications Corp
Ontario Court File No. 10-47357
16)           
Canwest Interactive
Ontario Court File No. 10-47357
17)           
Canwest Limited Partnership
Ontario Court File No. 10-47357
18)           
Canwest Mediaworks Inc.
Ontario Court File No. 10-47357
19)           
Canwest Mediaworks Publications Inc.
Ontario Court File No. 10-47357
20)           
Canwest Publishing Inc.
Ontario Court File No. 10-47357
21)           
Catherine McMillan
Ontario Court File No: 08-CV-352197SR
22)           
Constance Fournier
Ontario Court File No. 07-CV-039927SR
23)           
Constance Fournier
Ontario Court File No: 08-CV-352197SR
24)           
Constance Fournier
Ontario Court File No. 08-CV-352212SR
25)           
Cowichan Valley Citizen
Ontario Court File No. 10-47357
26)           
Crossroads Television System Inc.
Ontario Court File No. 10-49969
27)           
Dan Lepage (SaskBigPicture)
Ontario Court File No. 07-CV-039927SR
28)           
Eternal Moment Bookstore
Ontario Court File No. 02-CV-237691SR
29)           
Ezra Levant
Ontario Court File No: 08-CV-352197SR
30)           
Ezra Levant
Ontario Court File No. CV-09-00370919
31)           
Ezra Levant
Ontario Court File No. 12-53851
32)           
Ezra Levant
Ontario Court File No. 12-55389
33)           
Ontario Court File No: 08-CV-352197SR
34)           
Ontario Court File No: 08-CV-352197SR
35)           
Ontario Court File No. 08-CV-352212SR
36)           
Global TV Calgary
Ontario Court File No. 10-47357
37)           
Global TV Lethbridge
Ontario Court File No. 10-47357
38)           
Jason Bertucci (Faramir)
Ontario Court File No. 07-CV-039927SR
39)           
Jason Ouwendyk
Ontario Small Claims Court File No. 03-SC-081720
40)           
John Doe (conscience)
Ontario Court File No. 07-CV-039927SR
41)           
John Doe (HR-101)
Ontario Court File No. 07-CV-039927SR
42)           
John Doe (Klinxx)
Ontario Court File No. 07-CV-039927SR
43)           
John Doe (Padraigh)
Ontario Court File No. 07-CV-039927SR
44)           
Jonathan Kay
Ontario Court File No: 08-CV-352197SR
45)           
Kamloops Public Library
46)           
Kathy Shaidle
Ontario Court File No: 08-CV-352197SR
47)           
Kathy Shaidle
Ontario Court File No. 12-53851
48)           
Kelly McParland
Ontario Court File No. CV-09-00370919
49)           
Knowledge Bookstore
Ontario Court File No. 02-CV-237691SR
50)           
Mark Fournier
Ontario Court File No: 08-CV-352197SR
51)           
Mark Fournier
Ontario Court File No. 07-CV-039927SR
52)           
Mark Fournier
Ontario Court File No. 08-CV-352212SR
53)           
Michael Coren
Ontario Court File No. 10-49969
54)           
Michael Coren
Ontario Court File No. 12-53851
55)           
Michael Veck
Ontario Court File No. CV-10-410527
56)           
National Post Company
Ontario Court File No: 08-CV-352197SR
57)           
National Post Company
Ontario Court File No. CV-09-00370919
58)           
Northern Alliance
Ontario Small Claims Court File No. 03-SC-081720
59)           
Paul Fromm
Ontario Court File No: 04-CV-26550SR
60)           
Preferred Network
Ontario Court File No. 02-CV-237691SR
61)           
Quebecor Media Inc.
Ontario Court File No. 12-53851
62)           
Quebecor Media Inc.
Ontario Court File No. 12-55389
63)           
Quesnel Cariboo Observer (Newspaper)
64)           
Roger Smith (Peter O’ Donnell)
Ontario Court File No. 07-CV-039927SR
65)           
Russell McOrmond
66)           
Seekers Books
Ontario Court File No. 02-CV-237691SR
67)           
Shirley Skolos
Ontario Court File No. 10-47357
68)           
Ontario Court File No: 08-CV-352197SR
69)           
Sun Media Corporation
Ontario Court File No. 12-53851
70)           
Sun Media Corporation
Ontario Court File No. 12-55389
71)           
Sun TV News General Partnership
Ontario Court File No. 12-55389
72)           
The McGill Tribune
73)           
Thompson Nicola Regional Public Libraries
Macleans Magazine: April 21, 2008
74)           
Tom Kennedy
Ontario Court File No. 02-CV-237691SR
75)           
Toronto Public Library
Toronto Public Library:  MATERIALS REVIEW COMMITTEE RECONSIDERATION OF MATERIALS SUMMARY – 2002
76)           
TVA Group Inc.
Ontario Court File No. 12-55389
77)           
Vancouver Public Library
78)           
Victoria Indymedia
79)           
Victoria Public Library
80)           
Walker Morrow
Ontario Court File No. 10-47357
81)           
William Grosvenor
Ontario Court File No. 08-CV-40460SR
Lawsuits filed under Canada’s Copyright Act
1)
Richard Warman and National Post v Mark and Constance Fournier
Federal Court of Canada:  T-784-11
2)
Richard Warman and National Post v Mark and Constance Fournier
Federal Court of Appeal:  A-395-12
Section 13 Complaints by Richard Warman
Cases before the CHRC and/or Canadian Human Rights Tribunal
1
T726_3102
FRED KYBURZ
2
T998/11804
Eldon Warman
3
T869/11903
Alexan Kulbashian,
4
T869/11903
James Scott Richardson,
5
T869/11903
Tri-city Skins.com,
6
T869/11903
Canadian Ethnic Cleansing Team,
7
T869/11903
Affordable Space.com
8
T1021/0205
Tomasz Winnicki
9
T1072/5305
Craig Harrison
10
T1071/5205
Peter Kouba
11
T1088/6905
Glenn Bahr
12
T1087/6805
Western Canada for Us
13
T1104/8505
Terry Tremaine
14
20031846
Alex Di Civita
15
20031844
Liz Lampman
16
T1095/7605
Bobby Wilkinson
17
T1095/7605
“Canadian Nazi Party”
18
T1106/8705
Jessica Beaumont
19
T1073/5405
Marc Lemire
20
20031956
Freedomsite .org
21
T1090/7105
Melissa Guille
22
T1090/7105
Canadian Heritage Alliance
23
Ciaran Paul Donnelly
24
20030360
WCOTC (World Church of the Creator)
25
T1217/2907
Jason Ouwendyk
26
T1216/2807
Northern Alliance
Criminal Complaints by Richard Warman
1
Alexan Kulbashian
Warman’s Testimony in Lemire Case
2
Arthur Topham
3
Bill White
4
Ciarian Donnelly
Warman’s Testimony in Lemire Case
5
Craig Harrison
Warman’s Testimony in Lemire Case
6
Freedomsite
Warman’s Testimony in Lemire Case
7
Glenn Bahr
Warman’s Testimony in Lemire Case
8
James Richardson
Warman’s Testimony in Lemire Case
9
Jessica Beaumont
Warman’s Testimony in Lemire Case
10
Marc Lemire
Warman’s Testimony in Lemire Case
11
Peter Kouba
Warman’s Testimony in Lemire Case
12
Terry Tremaine
13
William Grosvenor
Warman Speech – University of Moncton – March 16, 2010
  • Please note, for all cases; please refer to the original source material.  In the case of the Libel suits, where the source is indicated as a court file, that is an actual lawsuit Warman has filed.  Where the source is something other, like a URL, please refer to the originating material.  This may or may not be a lawsuit or threatened lawsuit by Warman.  The truths of the statements are via the websites.
  • Please refer to the original source material.  This document consists of an overview of cases which (it appears that) Warman has filed or threatened.  This is not a complete list.  There may be many other cases in all categories, including criminal complaints, libel complaints, Section 13 cases, etc.
  • If any mistakes are made of this page, please send an email to; marc@lemire.com for correction.
 
Richard Warman’s ‘Maximum Disruption’ Approach:
Defamation Suits, Criminal Complaints, Section 13 cases and even Copyright Act lawsuits

Richard Warman turns against the Jews

It was three years ago that I first paid any serious attention to Richard Warman. I had come across a website that claimed that Warman was personally responsible for more than half of all section 13 censorship complaints to the Canadian Human Rights Commission -- and all but two such prosecutions before the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal.

One man.

I will tell you that I was exceedingly skeptical when I first read that. It seemed like a conspiracy theory. After all, Warman had been a CHRC staffer when he started filing all of those complaints. And even when he left the CHRC, he still had the run of the office, stopping in to the CHRC's secure facility, telling his colleagues how to investigate his complaints, even accessing their computers.

Seriously: that kind of corruption just didn't sound credible.

I meticulously checked the CHRT's website, and started to read thousands of pages of CHRT transcripts, and found that it was indeed true. I also discovered that Warman had been awarded tens of thousands of dollars -- tax free -- for making those complaints. And, most shockingly, I found that Warman, while working for the CHRC, allegedly combating "hate", actually joined neo-Nazi organizations like Stormfront and Vanguard, and began publishing hundreds and hundreds of bigoted statements online. Some are so shocking I remember them to this day, such as his declaration that gays are a "cancer" on society; that white police should be loyal to "their race" and that Canada should have an apartheid city called "Whiteville". He also vomited on the Jews whenever he could, disparaging the Jewish students club called Hillel, and writing that Jewish politicians were "scum".

In other words, what I had written off as a nutty conspiracy theory was the awful truth -- about Richard Warman, and about the Canadian Human Rights Commission.

I also discovered that Warman is the most thin-skinned man in Canada. Because in addition to filing the vast majority of all of the section 13 censorship cases heard by the CHRT, Warman has sued or threatened to sue no fewer than 60 different Canadians -- often just for calling him a censor.

Amongst those he sued or threatened to sue are a minor child; a charity; and at least two public libraries. 

Needless to say, it wasn't very long before Warman sued me for writing the truth about him. (Those suits are ongoing.)

But something has changed along the way. Over the past three years, Warman has shifted his focus. Until I started to write about him in early 2008, he usually sued white supremacists and neo-Nazis. I acknowledge that many of the people Warman accused of being white supremacists actually aren't -- that's just part of Warman's demonization of his political enemies. But some of them truly were racists.

I think that's why the Canadian Jewish Congress, and Bernie "Burny" Farber in particular, loved Warman so much. His penchant for censoring people, his boastful abuse of process and countless nuisance suits were very un-Jewish. But Farber and the CJC didn't mind, as long as Warman was going after anti-Semites.

But Warman's strategy of nuisance suits (he actually has a name for his conduct: "maximum disruption") has metastasized. He doesn't sue anti-Semites anymore. He sues Jews, and non-Jewish supporters of the Jews.

Since February of 2008, Warman has sued me, Kate McMillan of SmallDeadAnimals.com, Kathy Shaidle of FiveFeetofFury.com, FreeDominion.com, Walker Morrow, Michael Veck, Jonathan Kay and the National Post -- all for criticizing his campaign of censorship and his prolific online bigotry.

Let's go through Warman's new enemies list:

Ezra Levant: I'm a Jew, and a former board member of the Canada-Israel Committee. As a journalist, I often write sympathetically about Israel and critically of radical Islam.

Kate McMillan: Kate is a Gentile pro-Israel blogger who has been to Israel.

Kathy Shaidle: Kathy is also a Gentile pro-Israel blogger who has been to Israel too. She also participates in grassroots pro-Israel events in Toronto, including those where many Jews would feel afraid to attend because of abusive radical Muslim or labour union bullying.

Free Dominion's Connie and Mark Fournier: Connie and Mark run a broad Internet chat site, with a very wide range of opinions. But the dominant foreign affairs theme of their site is support for the war on terror, and support for Israel. Connie and Mark themselves are pro-Israel Gentiles.

Walker Morrow: Walker is a high school student from B.C. He is also a pro-Israel Gentile blogger.

Michael Veck: Michael is a pro-Israel political staffer on Parliament Hill. I'm not sure if he's Jewish; I think he is part-Jewish and is reclaiming his roots.

Jonathan Kay and the National Post: Jonathan Kay is the comment editor of the National Post, the most pro-Israel page in Canadian media. Jonathan himself writes many of the Post's Israel editorials.

Do you see a pattern here?

Warman has gone from collecting scalps of anti-Semites to collecting scalps of Jews and righteous Gentiles.

I hear he has even filed a human rights censorship complaint against the Jewish Defence League, because they aired Geert Wilder's acclaimed film about radical Islam, called Fitna. So that's another Jewish target of Warman's campaign of harassment.

But now Warman has attacked another friend of the Jews, Arnie Lemaire. You may know Arnie better as the blogger Blazing Catfur -- who also happens to be Kathy Shaidle's husband. Like Kathy, Arnie has participated in a pro-Israel mission. But that's the least of it. It's rare that a single day goes by when Arnie isn't doing dramatic, primary research about radical Islam in Canada -- the kind of investigative journalism that the mainstream media should be doing, but doesn't. In fact, many of Arnie's scoops soon become front page stories, when MSM journalists take his work and run with it. Just to name the most recent example, it was Arnie who blew the whistle on Zijad Delic, the radical imam of the anti-Semitic Canadian Islamic Congress, who had been invited by the Department of Defence to give a talk to the government. After Arnie's expose leapt from his blog onto TV, Peter MacKay himself cancelled the event.

That's Arnie.

So it shouldn't surprise you that Richard Warman is now suing Arnie for $500,000. Amongst Arnie's crimes? Linking to the website of Mark Steyn. Seriously. (I should note that Warman hasn't sued Steyn -- he's too afraid to do so. Warman's specialty is suing penniless bloggers or pushover media outlets happy to pay a nuisance settlement. Neither describes Mark Steyn and Maclean's.)

So I am writing this blog entry for two reasons.

The first is to ask you, my dear readers who have been so helpful to me throughout my own battles against censorship, to chip in to help Arnie fend off Warman's predatory lawsuit. Would you please visit his website, and click on his PayPal button? You wouldn't just be helping Arnie. You'd be helping me, too, and everyone else being victimized by Warman. Because we must all stand united against that bullying censor.

That's the first reason: to help Arnie.

The second reason I'm writing is to note how unmoored from reality the Burny and the Canadian Jewish Congress have become.

Perhaps, until 2008, Burny and the CJC could justify their support for a foul-mouthed censor, because he was picking on anti-Semites. Perhaps.

But it's 2010 now, almost 2011. Warman's section 13 complaints have been shut down by the CHRT, which has ruled them unconstitutional -- in part because of Warman's aggressive and abusive conduct.

So now it's just the lawsuits. And all the new ones are against Jews and pro-Jewish Gentiles.

All of them.

You'd think Burny would have got the message last spring, when a ruling by the CHRT itself focused on Warman's anti-Semitic conduct, drawing attention to Warman's slander of Jews as "scum", and calling Warman's activities "disappointing and disturbing".

You just know that Warman would have sued that judge if he could!

If you take Arnie and Kathy and Kate and the Fourniers and Walker and Michael and Jonathan and me out of the game, that's a big chunk of the pro-Israel, pro-Jewish commentariat that Warman wants to silence. And, in Arnie's case, it's shutting down Canada's leading investigative reporter who is actually exposing dangerous developments that threaten the Jewish community. And then there's the complaint against the JDL.

Burny has supported this every step of the way. Shame on him.

It's one thing for Burny to continue to be friends with Warman, a man who calls Jews "scum". That's between Burny and his therapist. But it's quite another for Burny to bring the entire CJC into disrepute by endorsing Warman's lawsuit pogrom.

I hear that Burny is about to be shuffled out of his position at the CJC. We'll see. But if he does lose his position, I wouldn't doubt that his willful blindness to the anti-Jewish, anti-Zionist bullying by his friend Richard Warman was a part of his downfall.

Thursday, 3 January 2013

Five years and still in court against Nazi lawyer Richard Warman

Tomorrow, January 3rd, 2013, Mark and Connie Fournier from Free Dominion and John Does will again be at the Elgin St. (Ottawa) courthouse in yet another motion hearing in the lawsuit brought against them by Richard Warman.

Whether you’d like to support them or if you would just like to observe lawfare at work, come on down.  Other cases permitting, the ball should get rolling around 9 am.

This case has already set legal precedents in the field of internet privacy which are being cited in Canada as well as in the USA, so it is worth it to keep our eyes on this one!

Mrs. Warman I Presume: Lise Warman (Government Lawyer) and spouce of Nazi Lawyer Richard Warman

Mrs. Warman I Presume

Richard Warman, Anne Cools, CHRC, Ezra LevantOne of the enduring mysteries surrounding the assorted Richard Warman defamation cases against assorted Canadian bloggers has been the assumption by the defendants that our hero only had access to a single computer the hard drive of which has now been independently examined.
After all, the Hate Sniffer was, at the time married to Lise Warman for a couple of years. In this modern world was it not possible that Lise had a computer at home as well? Up until quite recently that was merely a pretty good hunch. But I was poking about on an entirely unrelated subject and came across Richard and Lise’s testimony in the William White case (the odious White Supremacist who was convicted, on appeal, of soliciting the murder of the Hate-Sniffer in Chief.)
Let’s go to the transcript of Lise Warman’s testimony:
Q Good afternoon, Ms. Warman. Would you introduce yourself
2 to the jurors.
3 A Certainly. My name is Lise Warman, and I am Richard
4 Warman’s spouse.
5 Q You may want to pull that microphone a bit closer so
6 everyone can hear you.
7 Where do you live?
8 A I live in Ottawa, Canada.
9 Q And you’ve been married to Richard Warman since 2001?
10 A That’s correct.
11 Q What do you do for a living?
12 A I’m a lawyer. I am an assistant Crown attorney, which is
13 equivalent of assistant district attorney for you. So I’m a
14 criminal prosecutor and I prosecute offenders.
15 Q What type of cases do you prosecute?
16 A We have a criminal code in Canada, so we prosecute
17 everything that’s a criminal code, including theft, all the
18 way up to the murder cases. We don’t do drugs or federal
19 statutes.
20 Q What do you specialize in?
21 A I specialize in Internet child exploitation, sexual
22 assault. We do everything, but those are mostly my areas
23 of –

(you can find the reference here but I can’t get the link to the transcript to work. I have it if anyone wants it.)
So, now there is more than merely a hunch – Mrs. Warman specifically prosecuted cases of Internet Child Exploitation. In other words, the nature of her job meant that she did very much the same sort of thing as her husband except, of course, she was prosecuting actual internet criminals under the Criminal Code. (And good for her say I.)
However, it does raise some interesting and, I suspect, important questions. First, did Mrs. W. have a computer at home for work or simply because she was a wired up kinda gal? Second, did the Warmans trade tips on how best to engage their respective prey? Third, why have none of the defendants in the assorted Cools related defamation cases sought to examine Mrs. W’s computer (assuming, rather plausibly, she had one) to determine if hubby might have been using it as a back up/cut out machine? I am sure more computer savvy people than I will have further questions one of which might well be whether Mrs. W’s computer shared the same IP that Bernard Klatt swore the Cools post came from?
And, while we tease out these possibilities, let’s hope Connie and FreeDominion prevail tomorrow in motions court in the Do’s matter. Apparently Connie would like a jury trial. Which would be fascinating. (Oddly, I gather that the Hate Sniffer in Chief’s counsel are not so keen on letting the hoi polloi nobble the judge with messy findings of fact.