- Richard Warman's Covert Alias:
- 90sAREover
Used for:
Posting to the Freedomsite.Org website message
board
What was posted by Warman
“Not only is
Canadian Senator Anne Cools is a Negro, she is also an immigrant!
And she is also one helluva preachy c*nt.
She does NOT belong in my Canada. My Anglo-Germanic people were here
before
there was a Canada and her kind have jumped in, polluted our race, and
forced
their bullshit down our throats.
Time to go back to when the women nigger imports knew their place…
And that place was NOT in public!
Posted:
Sep. 5, 2003
|
FreeDominion
Is Richard Warman a racist bigot, or was he "just
following orders" issued by his masters at the Canadian Human
Rights Commission when he posted the headlined message above on a
Freedomsite forum on September 5, 2003? Whatever the answer, the same
CHRC that has ruled Bible verses to be hate speech doesn't seem to
consider these words to be a problem.
But they are a big problem, for both Richard Warman and the CHRC, and
the rest of what he wrote only makes matters worse.
“Not only is
Canadian Senator Anne Cools is a Negro, she is also an immigrant!
And she is also one helluva preachy c*nt.
She does NOT belong in my Canada. My Anglo-Germanic people were here
before
there was a Canada and her kind have jumped in, polluted our race, and
forced
their bullshit down our throats.
Time to go back to when the women nigger imports knew their place…
And that place was NOT in public!
It may be mere coincidence that Richard Warman is in
fact an Anglo-German, but it is not likely a coincidence at all that the
owner of the website where Richard Warman posted this racist screed
against Sen. Anne Cools came under attack by the CHRC shortly after
Richard Warman began his complaint-less investigation there.
Complaint-less investigations by the CHRC have been in the news lately
because information has surfaced concerning CHRC operative Dean Steacy
and his official exploits as 'Jadewarr'. But compared to his colleague
Richard Warman, Dean Steacy is a piker. Richard Warman enters a forum
swinging as '90sAREover'.
In testimony beginning January 29, 2007 Richard Warman admitted
under oath in Canadian Human Rights
Tribunal hearing (Case T1073/5405) that he was, in fact, the
poster named 'lucy' who had registered on the Freedomsite (and other)
forums. What he neglected to add was that 'lucy' was not his first
Freedomsite screen name. He failed to mention that his complaint-less
investigation of Freedomsite actually began two months before 'lucy' hit
the scene, it began when he registered on the Freedomsite under the
screen name '90sAREover'.
Another miscalculation by Richard Warman was the technical expertise of
the target of this particular setup operation. Marc Lemire is a techie,
a networking nerd, so it was not much of a problem for him to find
information on both 'lucy' and '90sAREover' in the Freedomsite database.
The table reproduced below shows information found in the Freedomsite
database comparing Richard Warman's admitted 'lucy' identity (left
column) to information about '90sAREover' (right column). This table
infomation was gathered by expert technology witness Bernard Klatt and
submitted as evidence to a Canadian Human Rights Tribunal on February 8,
2007.
| Admitted
Richard Warman/lucy info |
90sAREover
info |
| IP address = 66.185.84.204 |
IP address = 66.185.84.204 |
| ISP = Rogers Cable |
ISP = Rogers Cable |
| OS = Windows 98 |
OS = Windows 98 |
| Browser = Mozilla 4.0 compatible MSIE 6.0 |
Browser = Mozilla 4.0 compatible MSIE 6.0 |
| ID = lucy (lucyaubrack@yahoo.ca) |
ID = 90sAREover (rob_m_simpson@hotmail.com) |
| setup using anonymous email account |
setup using anonymous email account |
| on obscure message limited-interest board |
on obscure message limited-interest board |
| logged onto message board only twice |
logged onto message board only twice |
| very short usage time (120 min) |
very short usage time (14 min) |
| no optional info supplied |
no optional info supplied |
| created for single purpose |
created for single purpose |
| used Nov. 11, 15, 23, 2003 |
used Sep. 5, 2003 |
Mr. Klatt concludes in Paragraph 71 of his affidavit:
"Based on the information provided
in this affidavit, in my expert opinion, I concluded that the
Freedomsite message board user accounts "90sAREover" and
"lucy" are those of
Richard Warman and that Richard Warman was the poster of the message
headed "Cools don't belong in our Senate" posted September 5,
2003."
There is also no doubt that the CHRC was aware of this internet posting
by 90sAREover because it was a part of the original complaint filed by
Richard Warman, when referred to tribunal. But this posting is no longer
a part of the CHRC complaint against Lemire, the CHRC dropped it from
the complaint the day after Mr. Lemire won a decision to subpoena
Rogers' internet records.
This posting by 90sAREover would be a slam dunk in a real court of law,
so why did the CHRC drop it from the complaint?
This story is far from over because the attacks on Marc Lemire by the
CHRC are ongoing and with no end in sight, as are the attacks on many
other Canadians by this government agency. This story is also far from
being completely told. More ugly twists and turns will be revealed as
those at the center of it all give us leave to report the details.
Slowly but surely the truth is coming out.
And it isn't pretty.
Richard
Warman’s “maximum disruption” libel cases
reveal too much
FreeDominion
Richard Warman’s strategy of maximum disruption of the
lives of those who hold political opinions unapproved by Richard Warman
included many tactics. He associated with violent brownshirts like those
from the ARA, with painfully obvious obliqueness he counselled physical
assault on his targets, he tried to frame his victims by planting
evidence against them on their websites and then dragging them into a
CHRT kangaroo court for summary convictions. Suing individuals in civil
court was also one of his tactics, as can be seen with his attempt to
silence Free Dominion via his lawsuit against Mark and Connie Fournier.
Warman’s suit against Free Dominion was likely motivated by the fact
that some posters at FD had begun posting hints about the operations of
Richard Warman. He understood better than any of us how much he had to
hide. In the end, it was this civil suit that initiated his downfall.
Instead of succumbing to fear we began to look even deeper into Richard
Warman’s activities.
Richard Warman lived in his own little world where he was surrounded by
pro-censorship organizations like the CHRC and the CJC. In this tight
little club he received awards and accolades for selling off the liberty
of all Canadians. But now the country knows what he was really doing and
we are learning very much about the agencies and political philosophies
that were supporting his operations. And the more we learn, the dirtier
they all become.
Free Dominion published transcript evidence that Richard Warman was
indeed Lucy and that Lucy and "90sAREover" (of the Anne
Cools/n*gger c*nt post) were using the same computer and the same IP
address. Now more IP evidence has arisen as a result of Warman’s libel
complaint against Paul Fromm.
In Warman v. Fromm, Volume 1 of the Book of Documents – Tab 4 Richard
Warman submits as evidence a document written by Paul Fromm titled, “Jewish
Lobby being re-organized”. Richard Warman copied this document on
October 15, 2003 from the URL http://www.freedomsite.org/pipermail/fs_announce/2003/001248.html.
A check of the freedomsite log files for the event in question produced
this result:
| Quote: |
| wc09.mtnk.rnc.net.cable.rogers.com
- - [15/Oct/2003:20:46:13 -0400] "GET /pipermail/fs_announce/2003/001248.html
HTTP/1.1" 200 18740 "http://www.freedomsite.org/pipermail/fs_announce/2003/date.html"
"Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98)" |
What this shows is that Richard Warman printed out the document:
| Quote: |
Using hostname:
wc09.mtnk.rnc.net.cable.rogers.com
On: 15/Oct/2003:20:46:13 (8:46PM)
He accessed the document by clicking on a link at: http://www.freedomsite.org/pipermail/fs_announce/2003/date.html
(known as the referrer)
And was using: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows
98) |
In 2003, Mr. Lemire was running TWO servers. One of them ran the message
board (a Windows-based computer), and a totally separate Linux box was
running the website. The above log entry is from the SECOND server, and
is, thus, a secondary source to confirm exactly what Warman was doing.
SAME IP ADDRESS WARMAN USED ON THE MESSAGE BOARD
The second server that Lemire was running logged the visitors by either
hostname or IP address. As you can see above it was the HOSTNAME that
was logged.
The hostname is: wc09.mtnk.rnc.net.cable.rogers.com
That hostname matches exactly the IP address used by Warman on the
message board when he registered as Lucy…which is also the IP address
used in the notorious Cools post.
66.185.84.204 = [ wc09.mtnk.rnc.net.cable.rogers.com ]
You can verify this yourself on your own computer by doing this:
Click on Start button.
Click on RUN
In the box type: cmd (then click OK)
(a black DOS window will open)
Then type this exactly as I have it: nslookup
wc09.mtnk.rnc.net.cable.rogers.com
You should see this:
C:\>nslookup wc09.mtnk.rnc.net.cable.rogers.com
*** Can't find server name for address 192.168.1.1: Non-existent domain
*** Default servers are not available
Server: UnKnown
Address: 192.168.1.1
Non-authoritative answer:
Name: wc09.mtnk.rnc.net.cable.rogers.com
Address: 66.185.84.204
So here is the new timeline:
September 5, 2003: Richard Warman had the IP address of:
66.185.84.204 (Expert witness Bernard Klatt testified on this) and
posted the message against Senator Anne Cools.
October 15, 2003: Richard Warman had the IP address of:
66.185.84.204. Printed material to be used in the Paul Fromm Libel case.
(Book of documents – Volume 1 – Tab 3 and 4)
November 11, 15 and 23rd, 2003: Richard Warman had the IP address
of: 66.185.84.204 (Warman testified he visited the Freedomsite on these
dates – see page 1 of the complaint form filed by Warman against
Lemire)
Click Here
to see the evidence that is being submitted to the tribunal.
Jonathan
Kay on Richard Warman and Canada's phony-racism industry
Posted: February 18, 2008, 1:14 P
M
by Jonathan Kay
Jonathan Kay | National
Post
Canadians now know the precise
moment when radical anti-racism became a more powerful sociological
toxin than racism itself: 7:55pm EST on Sept. 5, 2003.
That is the date-stamp on a particularly vile
posting, left by an anonymous user on the message board of the
right-wing web site freedomsite.org, attacking
Canada
’s first black senator. It read as follows: “Not only is Canadian
Senator Anne Cools is a Negro, she is also an immigrant! And she is also
one helluva preachy c*nt. She does NOT belong in my
Canada
.
M
y Anglo-Germanic people were here before there was a
Canada
and her kind have jumped in, polluted our race, and forced their
bullshit down our throats. Time to go back to when the women *** imports
knew their place … And that place was NOT in public!”
Horrible, shocking stuff. But even more shocking
is the identity of the fellow whose electronic fingerprints were all
over the message: famed Canadian human-rights lawyer Richard Warman.
Warman is a legend in anti-racism circles. A
former member of the Canadian Human Rights Commission, he’s launched
countless complaints against right-wing extremists, and won almost all
of them. But during proceedings surrounding one of Warman’s 2003-era
complaints against freedomsite, the respondents turned the tables. A
computer expert named
Bernard Klatt
did some digging under freedomsite’s back office, and determined that
the Cools posting had been made from a computer bearing the IP address
66.185.84.204, the very same address from which Warman had admitted to
visiting freedomsite using a different alias.
Other technical details – such as the operating
system and Web browser being used – also provided an exact match to
Warman. Based on this evidence, Klatt concluded in a recently publicized
affidavit, “Richard Warman was the poster of the message headed
‘Cools don’t belong in our Senate.’ ”
Does this mean Warman is a closet bigot? I doubt
it. What seems more likely is that – like other anti-racism activists
– Warman simply found himself running out of Aryan Nation types to
chase around the Internet. And so, under this theory, he decided to just
start typing the stuff up on his own computer – and then added these
self-authored “racist” postings to his blunderbuss brief against
freedomsite. (As Klatt notes, Warman has been accused of perpetrating
the same sort of stunts on other right-wing Web sites.) When you’ve
got profitable hate-speech cases to prosecute, why wait for some
unemployed conspiracy theorist to start raving against immigrants when
you can just manufacture the evidence yourself?
Bizarre as this episode may be, it is of a piece
with a larger trend – symbolized, south of the border, by the
shamefully trumped up case against the
Duke
University
lacrosse team. The anti-racism industry, running out of legitimate
hatemongers to go after, has gone rogue in its search for attention and
relevance.
It also raises the question: How many other
faux-racist frauds are out there? Thanks to Warman, it's a question I
now think about every time a Canadian hate-speech activist or blogger
publicizes an email he gets from some whitepower22@hotmail.com
or other. These poisonous messages are held up as dramatic proof that
there are still plenty of Nazi types out there – and that without
hate-speech laws to shut them up, the country’s gays, Jews, Black and
Arabs will remain at risk of verbal assault, or worse. But if the
picking are so slim that anti-racists have slid into second careers as
fiction writers, what does that say about the scale of the problem? How
many of the other examples of “hate” that you see out there are
similarly bogus?
The anti-racism industry has become an industry
like any other: As the actual need for what its peddling has diminished
in this extraordinarily tolerant nation, the industry’s various
profiteers and carnival barkers have created myths and exaggerated fears
to prop themselves up.
As I’ve written before, this would not be so
much a problem if their various speech codes were used merely to
prosecute men such as David Ahenakew, Ernst Zundel, Jim Keegstra and the
like. But in the post-9/11 era, radical anti-racists are also agitating
to shut up sensible people saying sensible things about the war against
militant Islam, the defining global struggle of our era. They’re also
giving comfort to Islamists who seek to carve out sectarian taboos from
our hallowed tradition of free speech.
All of this would be destructive enough on its
own. When the censors start churning out the hate speech themselves –
that makes them as much a farce as a menace.
| Sunday, 20 January
2008 |
Further to the post
below, Kathy Shaidle takes up the curious subject of serial plaintiff
Richard Warman, author of the
forthcoming book How To Use Words Like N*gger And C*nt For
Fun And Profit.
Many of us have
been caught in a quandary by this Human Rights farrago of a
travesty of a farrago. As David Warren suggests,
we could easily counter-sue and pile up a zillion nuisance
suits. But to do so would offend against a principled belief
that these human rights tribunals are illegitimate. However,
given that he has been a plaintiff on every single Section XIII
case before the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal since 2002, and
that in not one of these cases has the CHRT found in favour of
the defendant, I wonder if we might not make an exception in
favour of Mr Warman. Just to reprise, these are words written
and electronically communicated by Richard Warman:
Not only is Canadian
Senator Anne Cools is a Negro, she is also an immigrant!
And she is also one helluva preachy c*nt.
She does NOT belong in my Canada. My Anglo-Germanic people were
here before
there was a Canada and her kind have jumped in, polluted our
race, and forced
their bullshit down our throats.
Time to go back to when the women nigger imports knew their
place…
And that place was NOT in public!
Quite the prose stylist,
eh? As I said previously, this isn't entrapment; it's
manufacturing the crime. Mr Warman posted these words on a
website and then used them as part of his complaint to the
Canadian Human Rights Commission. That is Scandal #1.
Furthermore, when
the defendant then made plain that he wished to subpoena the
records of the ISP to uncover the author of the above post, the
Canadian Human Rights Commission mysteriously dropped
it from the case. This suggests
an explicit collusion between the CHRC investigators and their
former colleague, Mr Warman. That is Scandal #2.
For posting these words
on the website and then taking said website to the Human Rights
Commission, Mr Warman has been substantially enriched by the
Canadian state. That is Scandal #3.
At this point, the
Minister of Justice needs to step in. The administration of
Section XIII is a public disgrace. I agree with Pundita
that it is, in fact, a criminal act in itself. The Minister
should order a judicial inquiry into the systemic
corruption of Section XIII. Furthermore, in the interim, Agent
Dean Steacy should be removed from all "hate" cases, all
current cases suspended, and the judgments in those cases
brought by Richard The Anglo-German Warman vacated. The mountain
of phony-baloney "jurisprudence"
based on the Warman racket should be tossed in the trash.
In the end, Maclean's
and I might prevail over this thug racket. But why
should we have to spend significant six-figure sums doing
so given the prima facie evidence above? Section XIII is
misbegotten in theory and a shakedown racket in practice. It's
time to end it.
|
Sunday, January 20, 2008
"Yeah, I'm a fascist, but for the
Left..."
-- Woody Allen in Manhattan (1977)
This
post must be read to be believed.
Looks like Richard Warman, the ex-Human Rights
Commission employee who uses the Commission as his
own personal s&m dungeon/ casino, has been well and truly
toasted.
FreeDominion says Richard Warman wrote something
disturbing at another website that I won't print here because The
Shotgun isn't my blog (but FreeDominion claims to have the ISP addresses
to prove it).
Be sure to read the whole thing, and, please
tell your MP what you think of this use of your tax dollars --
funding employees and ex-employees of the HRC in dubious
"undercover" activities.
Not content with having the Canadian Human Rights
Commission act as his own, private, shakedown agency, the easily
offended Richard Warman has, apparently, taken to posting vile, racist,
remarks under a now traced phony name. I am not going republish this
filth on my blog but go over to Free
Dominion for the details.
Three observations: first, this is profoundly corrupt.
Fake posts written by a serial complainant who then complains about the
fake post should be enough to prompt a full scale, judicial, inquiry
into the CHRC. How many other bigot-bots has Richard Warman fired into
forums and comment sections and then complained about. At a minimum
every one of Richard Warman’s complaints to the CHRC - and he has won
all of them - should be re-investigated for fraud.
Part of that judicial inquiry should focus on how
complicit the CHRC or its staff have been in this Richard Warman fraud
and any others which may have occurred.
Second, Richard Warman is a lawyer. As such he is not
supposed to be defrauding quasi-judicial bodies such as the CHRC. As
this story gains traction it will be interesting to see if, for example,
the proprietors of Free Dominion, ask the Benchers of the Law Society of
Upper Canada to investigate.
Third, the losing parties in Richard Warman CHRC
complaints would be well advised to seek legal advice as to the
possibility of re-opening their complaint and/or looking to real courts
for damages against Richard Warman and the CHRC.
Frankly, what little credibility the CHRC had has just
been shredded. If the Tories had any stones they would shut the
Commission down pending the outcome of a really hardcore, judicial,
investigation of Richard Warman’s fraud.
|
